Re: requiring payment (was spam)

ietf

Re: requiring payment (was spam)

2003-06-02 18:52:03



SK> We can continue this repartee as long as you wish. I do have a day


except that the exchange adds to already-problematic denial of service
attack on the list, by virtue of increasing the noise but not the
signal.

at the least, please take it offline.

d/
--
 Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: requiring payment (was spam), Stephen Kent Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Eliot Lear Re: Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Valdis . Kletnieks Re: Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Anthony Atkielski RE: Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Tomson Eric \(Yahoo.fr\) Re: Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Anthony Atkielski Re: Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Keith Moore Message not available Re: requiring payment (was spam), Dave Crocker <=

Previous by Date:	Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Eliot Lear
Next by Date:	Re: Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Valdis . Kletnieks
Previous by Thread:	Re: Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Keith Moore
Next by Thread:	Complaint from John Klensin against Dean Anderson, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]