Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly ad

I really wish that the IETF
had designed a decent NAT box spec


that's an oxymoron.  the basic premis of NAT is fundamnetally broken.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Valdis . Kletnieks NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the great transition), Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the great transition), james woodyatt Re: NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the great transition), Keith Moore Re: NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the great transition), james woodyatt Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore <= Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore

Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)