Re: archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...)

ietf

Re: archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...)

2003-06-16 14:06:20

What sort of message volume do you see?

How much disk storage do you have?

                --Dean

On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Keith Moore wrote:

I think that having all bounces (for whatever reason) archived is
fine; I think having it as "web pages somewhere" is overkill.


both the volume of spam, and the ratio of spam to legitimate content are
so high, that I'm not sure how much longer it will be practical to
archive it.  if we were to archive rejected messages, it should probably
only be for a few weeks.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, (continued) Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Bill Strahm Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, David Morris Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Vernon Schryver Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Dean Anderson Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...), Keith Moore Re: archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...), Vernon Schryver Re: archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...), Keith Moore Re: archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...), Vernon Schryver Re: archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...), Dean Anderson <= Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Vern Paxson

Previous by Date:	Re: archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...), Vernon Schryver
Next by Date:	Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, william
Previous by Thread:	Re: archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...), Vernon Schryver
Next by Thread:	Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Vern Paxson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]