Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon)

ietf

Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon)

2003-08-22 11:17:10

An understandable interpretation of my words (especially
taken out of the context of the larger point I was trying
to make), but not what I intended.

That paragraph was intended to convey what I perceived the
overall feel of the participants in the BOF to be. Any
decisions, of course, will be taken to the working group
for consensus.


good. sorry for the confusion!

/mtr

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), (continued) RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Ari Ollikainen Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Dave Crocker RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Adam Roach RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Harald Tveit Alvestrand RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Adam Roach Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Adam Roach Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Adam Roach Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Marshall Rose RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Adam Roach RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Adam Roach Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Marshall Rose <=

Previous by Date:	RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), David Morris
Next by Date:	RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Previous by Thread:	RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon), Adam Roach
Next by Thread:	Requirement for equipment for API test suite, Tim Wright
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]