Re: Removing features

Keith Moore wrote:
great.  now we'll have NAT boxes intercepting
outgoing DNS traffic also.


That was not my point. My point was to have a DNS server in the inside
configured for reverse lookup of private IPs.


one of the most-frequently cited justifications for NAT is plug-and-play.
expecting people to set up their own DNS servers sort of nullifies that.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Removing features, (continued) Re: Removing features, Keith Moore Re: Removing features, Valdis . Kletnieks rfc1918 impact, Leif Johansson Re: rfc1918 impact, Dean Anderson RE: rfc1918 impact, Jeroen Massar RE: rfc1918 impact, Dean Anderson RE: rfc1918 impact, Jeroen Massar Re: rfc1918 impact, Markus Stumpf RE: Removing features, Michel Py RE: Removing features, Jeroen Massar Re: Removing features, Keith Moore <= Re: Removing features, John C Klensin Re: Removing features, Keith Moore Re: Removing features, John C Klensin Re: Removing features, Iljitsch van Beijnum rfc1918 impact, Leif Johansson Re: rfc1918 impact, John C Klensin Re: rfc1918 impact, Leif Johansson Re: rfc1918 impact, Iljitsch van Beijnum

Previous by Date:	Re: Removing features, Valdis . Kletnieks
Next by Date:	Re: IESG proposed statement on the IETF mission, Scott W Brim
Previous by Thread:	RE: Removing features, Jeroen Massar
Next by Thread:	Re: Removing features, John C Klensin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]