Re: Re[4]: IPv6 addressing limitations (was "national security")

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 00:53:57 +0100, "Anthony G. Atkielski" 
<anthony(_at_)atkielski(_dot_)com>  said:

> Maybe it's time to find a different way to route.
If you know of a better way than BGP, feel free to suggest it,  Make sure you
do at least some back-of-envelope checks that it Does The Right Thing when
a single burp on one link of a multihomed site causes the withdrawal and
re-announcement of 50K routes.  And that the Right Thing happens when
a link outage happens 4-5 hops upstream...

While you're designing, remember that the routing table would be a lot bigger
if we weren't doing heavy CIDR aggregation - and that you'll burn a few bits
ensuring that aggregation works (try aggregating a /8 and 2 /12's even if 
they're
all announced from the same AS and are numerically consecutive...)

pgpxvp9E9Ldu4.pgp
Description: PGP signature