RE: Death of the Internet

Tony Hain wrote:
You won't get the development community to pay attention
to the simplicity afforded by IPv6 until the IETF stops
wasting time trying to extend a dead protocol.


If one in {IPv4,IPv6} could be qualified as dead, it's IPv6. If it was
not for IPv4, the majority of this list would not even be able to read
this.

Michel.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, (continued) Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Tim Chown Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Randall R. Stewart (home) Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Paul Robinson Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Paul Robinson Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Joe Abley Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, jfcm Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, John C Klensin Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, jfcm Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Tim Chown RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Michel Py <= Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, J. Noel Chiappa Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Hayriye Altunbasak Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Pekka Savola Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Pekka Savola Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, grenville armitage RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Michel Py Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Noel Chiappa Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Michael Thomas

RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11