Re: Death of the Internet

Noel Chiappa writes:

Now, can we all agree that almost 10 years after it was formally adopted by
the IETF, IPv6 is has clearly not succeeded in becoming the ubiquitous
replacement for IPv4, and needs to be moved to "Historic", so we can turn our
energy and attention to things that *will* succeed?


What leads you to believe that an alternate
solution set isn't the empty set? Isn't entropy
the easiest and most likely outcome?

            Mike

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, (continued) RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Michel Py Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, J. Noel Chiappa Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Hayriye Altunbasak Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Pekka Savola Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Pekka Savola Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, grenville armitage RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Michel Py Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Noel Chiappa Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Michael Thomas <= RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Noel Chiappa Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Eric A. Hall Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Joe Touch Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Eric A. Hall RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Tony Hain RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, John C Klensin Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Joe Touch RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Vernon Schryver RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, John C Klensin Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Dave Crocker

Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11