RE: Death of the Internet

Pekka Savola
Exactly.  As we have been saying for years not,
we must aim for co-existence of IPv4 and IPv6,
not replacing IPv4 with IPv6.


IPv6 is currently not worth the price of dual-stack, which is the very
reason it is not being deployed. As of transition mechanisms, they're
not good enough to run an IPv6-only network, which in turns makes
dual-stack mandatory.
 
Michel.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, (continued) Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Armando L. Caro Jr. Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, John Leslie Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Armando L. Caro Jr. Message not available Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, John C Klensin Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Dave Crocker Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Randall R. Stewart (home) Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Dean Anderson Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Randall R. Stewart (home) RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Michel Py RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Michel Py <= RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Pekka Savola Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Dan Kolis Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Eric A. Hall RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Michel Py Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, USPhoenix Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Noel Chiappa Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Noel Chiappa Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, John C Klensin Re: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Randall R. Stewart (home) RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11, Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar \(UMKC-Student\)

RE: Death of the Internet - details at 11