I don't KNOW that what I'm thinking is true, but I'm wondering to
myself if the target audience for protocol specification maintenance
is all in the IETF...
Spencer
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no>
To: "Rick Stewart" <rick(_dot_)stewart(_at_)theinternetco(_dot_)net>;
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection)
--On 8. mars 2004 12:38 -0700 Rick Stewart
<rick(_dot_)stewart(_at_)theinternetco(_dot_)net>
wrote:
Standard. In my experience the hardest part of getting a
document
advanced is to collect the implementation report.
Hence this modest proposal:
[clip]
I rather like the proposal. What's been lacking is any forum for
further
development of standards outside of mailing lists and IETF
meetings --
there's no tracking, and that's a major problem.
in draft-iesg-hardie-outline-01, the concept of a "maintenance team"
(called "IANA Team" in that document) was floated. This didn't get
much
discussion. Is this something that's worth discussing as an idea?
Harald
_______________________________________________
This message was passed through
ietf_censored(_at_)carmen(_dot_)ipv6(_dot_)cselt(_dot_)it,
which is a sublist of ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org(_dot_) Not all messages are
passed.
Decisions on what to pass are made solely by IETF_CENSORED ML
Administrator (ietf_admin(_at_)ngnet(_dot_)it).