ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents)

2004-03-27 17:07:13
Sound nice but isn't this go against the "rough consensus" principle?

You are free to doc your opinion (even if it is not rough consensus) in the
mailing list.

-James Seng

What I personally view as "crap" has no bearing in regards to these
points, excepting that where I feel strong enough to produce an I-D
detailing why I think something is "crap" I should be allowed
(if I can met general editorial and technical standards) to publish
that opinion as an RFC even though consensus of the IETF (or Keith's
review board or the RFC Editor) might be that my opinion is "crap".
(That opinion could be expressed in the form of an alternative protocol
specification.)




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>