Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?

At 18:20 28/04/04, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> In message <Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)44(_dot_)0404271736160(_dot_)27330-100000(_at_)cirrus(_dot_)av8(_dot_)net>, Dean 
> Ande
> rson writes:
> >On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> >> You're confusing URI methods, protocols, and TLDs disastrously.
> >I think it is you who is reading too much into the .tel and .mobi TLD.
> >These are not proposals to put URI method functionality into domain names,
>
> Sure there are.
yes. They are. And they do not make any technical sense that way.

We should make a clear response:
- these propostions are not acceptable as TLD
- please correct them as schemes propositions.

I confuse people enough with my Franglish grammatical mistakes to know how 
confusing it would be for people iI ICANN accepted a DNS grammatical mistake.
Unfortunately people wasted $ 50.000 in fear others could obatain ".tel". 
Good $ 100.000 bonus for ICANN. Last time they only got two TAF (TLD 
Application Fee) of $ 25.000. I understand no one from ICANN wants to say 
they will respect the DNS semantic: next time they may put the TAF at $ 
100.000 ....
jfc



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf