ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: STD series of documents

2004-06-14 05:27:55
I have long thought that the other document designations (STD, FYI, ...) 
are bound to continue to be confusing minor labels without much mind 
share as long as there documents are also RFCs. The only hope to get 
people to REALLY switch to using these new disgnations in general is to 
make those documents NOT be RFCs.

Thanks,
Donald
======================================================================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd                       
dee3(_at_)torque(_dot_)pothole(_dot_)com
 155 Beaver Street              +1-508-634-2066(h) +1-508-786-7554(w)
 Milford, MA 01757 USA                   
Donald(_dot_)Eastlake(_at_)motorola(_dot_)com

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, John C Klensin wrote:

Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:15:53 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john(_at_)jck(_dot_)com>
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: rfc-editor(_at_)rfc-editor(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: STD series of documents

Folks, 

This confusion about what STDs mean and what they might do for
us finally convinced me to turn an idea that has been kicked
around a few times into an I-D.  It is in the hands of the
posting queue and should, I assume, be announced today or
tomorrow.  Watch for an announcement for
draft-klensin-std-repurposing-00.txt or something like that.

High points...

      * STDs become a separate document series, independent of
      the underlying RFCs.
      
      * Their content is a function of IESG protocol actions
      or the equivalent, so that they define exactly what a
      particular standard "means" and what its content is at
      some point in time.  They are also a place to put
      comments and suggestions about usability and context to
      the extent to which the IETF wishes to make such
      statements.
      
      * They get activated at "Proposed", not "Internet
      Standard".
      
      * They contain explicit change history and tracking info.

It may not be right (and will need work even if it is), but the
document may at least help focus this, and some closely related,
discussions.

I expect discussion to occur on the Newtrk list.

    john


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>