ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to

2004-08-02 08:05:55
I don't know whether stopping "manyfolks" is right or not.

Sigh. Are there Internet Drafts that matter, that *don't* have inputs
from "many folks"? and if so, why?

I could never decide whether this was more likely a pure-hearted
attempt at modesty or an evil-hearted attempt to demonstrate that
"many folks back this draft, so can we have a Proposed Standard now?"

I remember noticing manyfolks drafts during about the same timeframe
as Internet Drafts with so many "authors" they couldn't all be listed
on the front page, so I leaned more toward the latter theory.
Fortunately, this isn't included in the part of the universe I'm in
charge of, these days.

Spencer



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>