Well, the choice to put this on the ietf-discuss list was deliberate:
including making sure that a reasonable cross section of the IETF
would see the discussion. It's not at all clear that such a cross
section would bother to subscribe to a new mailing list (and a new
mailing list often just attracts the people who are interested
for the wrong reasons).
In my personal opinion, it would be better to leave the discussion
here at least until the last call on the BCP is done. At that point,
we'll be into implementation, and if there are further
matters to discuss, it would be reasonable to say "we are now into
implementation phase, people who are interested can subscribe <here>".
Also, the threads are pretty easily identifiable (and skippable).
Again -- IMO.
Leslie.
Michael StJohns wrote:
The IASA, AdminRest et al discussions appear to be proceeding well, but
perhaps it might make sense to craft a mailing list specifically for
those discussions ? Its possible the recent (last 2 week) upswing in
the number of related posts to the ietf mailing list will die down
shortly, but my guess is not.
Later, Mike
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reality:
Yours to discover."
-- ThinkingCat
Leslie Daigle
leslie(_at_)thinkingcat(_dot_)com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf