-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Leslie Daigle wrote:
|
| Well, the choice to put this on the ietf-discuss list was deliberate:
| including making sure that a reasonable cross section of the IETF
| would see the discussion. It's not at all clear that such a cross
| section would bother to subscribe to a new mailing list (and a new
| mailing list often just attracts the people who are interested
| for the wrong reasons).
|
| In my personal opinion, it would be better to leave the discussion
| here at least until the last call on the BCP is done. At that point,
| we'll be into implementation, and if there are further
| matters to discuss, it would be reasonable to say "we are now into
| implementation phase, people who are interested can subscribe <here>".
|
| Also, the threads are pretty easily identifiable (and skippable).
Indeed. I'd much rather see the various NAT tro^H^H^Hdiscussions go
to the apropriate place. The restructuring discussion is important for
the community as a whole. This is exactly imo why we have an ietf list.
MVH leifj
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBuYOS8Jx8FtbMZncRAqJfAKC8Aj64LM8q3rwzOgRQklTQW/g70QCgukBh
YX2p9ezahwO6N42mY3FI+bc=
=FW6B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf