I tend to agree. As I mentioned in another note, I too am uncomfortable
with the appeal procedures.
In my case, I am not so much concerned about the ability to overturn
decisions, such as contracts that are signed, as I have accepted that
allowing this might make the job impossible. But I am concerned about
the inability for the IETF community to invoke censure against an IAD
who persists in making contractual arrangements that the IETF community
finds unacceptable.
Unless I am missing something in the document, there is no way for a
member of the IETf community to formally ask the IAOC to review the
decisions of the IAD. And while it is possible to lodge an appeal
against the IAOC for not supervising the IAD properly, I think this may
be a bit too roundabout.
a.
On 10 dec 2004, at 10.55, Sam Hartman wrote:
I'm not very comfortable with the appeal text in section 3.4. There
isn't a way to overturn decisions and there is no way to appeal
decisions because the wrong decision was made.
I understand why the current text is there. I understand there are
significant concerns about having either of the things I'd like to see
in an appeal system.
I will try and think of constructive ways of getting better
appealability without destroying the IASA's ability to do its job.
I'm also not sure how uncomfortable I am with the current text. I
know I don't like it, but it's hard to tell how strong that feeling
is.
--Sam
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf