--On lørdag, desember 18, 2004 13:04:52 -0500 William Allen Simpson
<wsimpson(_at_)greendragon(_dot_)com> wrote:
So, here's my promise to you. I'll track down McGregor, and we'll
write something up. I will work on moving my Proposed Standards,
assuming that the IESG is actually _interested_ in doing its job.
The proof will be in the pudding. In earlier times, I expected to
go from internet-draft to Proposed Standard in 2 IETF meetings, and
to Full Standard in under 1 year on average, 2 years for extremely
controversial items.
Did you ever get what you expected....?
Yes, certainly. And when I didn't, I helped lead the effort to reform
the structure of the IETF.... That worked for a couple more years.
(Without reorganization, we couldn't even have a IPSec WG. Steve Kent
prevented it.)
The reason why I was asking was that I've heard statements that "we were
much faster before" a number of times, while I've also heard lots of
stories of things that took years to accomplish "before".
So I'd rather ask again, explicitly:
- Which standards did you push from first I-D to PS in 2 IETF meetings?
- Which standards (apart from the ones that were "born that way") reached
Full Standard 1 year after going to PS?
At least we'd have a common understanding of the term "before"...
Harald
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf