Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions

ietf

Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions

2005-01-28 12:34:24

I support this text.  I prefer the last paragraph be present but this
is not a strong preference.

I'd like to find some way to make it clear to the community that other
forms of comments are appropriate but am happy to agree with Leslie
that the BCP is not the place for that.



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, Scott W Brim Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, Dean Anderson Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, John C Klensin Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, Dean Anderson Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, John C Klensin Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, Leslie Daigle Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, John C Klensin Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, Margaret Wasserman Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, Sam Hartman <= Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, avri

Previous by Date:	Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, John C Klensin
Next by Date:	Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, Margaret Wasserman
Previous by Thread:	Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, Margaret Wasserman
Next by Thread:	Re: Proposed consensus text: #725 Appealing decisions, avri
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]