Dear James,
A Registry can certainly take care of SLD, not of lower levels. IMHO the
problem is no more with IDNs (no one want to change RFC 3490!), but to
avoid to propagate the problem into the IRI. For that we need to have a
precise langtag to precisely define the IDN locale in the IRI and precises
rules concerning the way the IDN should the be built in the IRI (including
the TLD). Obviously such rules should only be to inform the user (I do not
thing there is way to force them), so may result from a BCP.
May be interesting to write it, rather than to leave it to ICANN or to ITU?
jfc
At 16:21 08/02/2005, James Seng wrote:
For the 5th time today, it is already documented in RFC 3490.
http://james.seng.cc/archives/2005/02/08/idn_and_homographs_spoofing.html
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
May be IDN specialists will want to comment this.
http://www.shmoo.com/idn/homograph.txt
Is this exact? This is urgent as the IRI is based upon IDN and support of
multilingualism is a WSIS priority and comments for the WGIG are to close
the day after tomorrow.
Thank you.
jfc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf