Keith Moore wrote:
IMHO, charters should not be bound to specific documents. It's one
thing to say "WG X will produce a document describing protocol Y", quite
another to say "WG X shall publish
draft-ietf-x-joe's-specification-for-y". It's up to the WG, not the
ADs, to decide which specification to submit to IESG to meet a
particular charter requirement. And WGs should be able to change their
minds about such things.
I agree with this. In fact I think it should take rough consensus to
keep a draft from becoming a WG draft. Alternatives are good!
Eliot
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf