Joel M. Halpern wrote:
Not needing NAT is a minor value add for IPv6. But we have
already seen several major corporations publicly indicate
that they intend to use NAT with IPv6, even though they can
get enough public address space.
Tim Chown wrote:
I assume the reason is lack of PI space, or is it a mixture
of the other commonly cited reasons?
The reasons are the same why they are currently using NAT with IPv4 even
though they have enough public IPv4 address space. We have discussed
these for ages; if my memory is correct, you are the one that convinced
me some years ago that IPv6 NAT was unavoidable :-)
Michel.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf