I thought you didn't understand the relevance because you started your
response with "I am not sure how this line of discussion relates to the
proposed BCP" and you ended your response with "So an attempt to bring this
thread into some relevance for the Last Call:"
To be honest I didn't understand why you wouldn't think it a relevant albeit
dissenting post. Anyway, we obviously both see very diffeent sides -
hopefly if either of us are right that's the school of thought that will
prevail.
Best regards,
Nick Staff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>
To: "Nicholas Staff" <nick(_dot_)staff(_at_)comcast(_dot_)net>;
<iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>;
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Email Submission Between Independent Networks' to
BCP - Clarification
See what worries me is when you didn't understand the relevence of my
post
you didn't ask me one question.
What makes you think I didn't understand the relevance of your post?
d/
---
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf