On Aug 10, 2005, at 6:36 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
I think that is a good point. A variation on that theme is that the
IETF is no longer run by people who actually implement protocols. The
relevance and impact of the IETF on what is actually used on the
Internet is marginalized through that change of membership. The
attitude of "That is not how we do things in the IETF" make people go
away.
Cheers,
Simon
hell o , yes it is,
simon , all , see i am the oppossite, a i highly motivated
undergraduated citizen.
with no money But i learn a lot in the last 2 year only by reading
lists and try to understand
what the real problem is or could be. I can´t do a lot, just raise
an issue
or have a meaning. But its fantastic to be part of the whole thing.
just my 2 cents
marcM.
from old germany;-P
C Wegrzyn <lists(_at_)garbagedump(_dot_)com> writes:
I think a big part of the issue is that the IETF has been taken over
little by little by corporate interests. Before it used to be for the
"love of doing it". Today it is more for "the benefit of one".
Chuck Wegrzyn
Marc Manthey wrote:
morning experts,
(Note that I haven't implemented any IETF protocols myself, but I
did once do an implementation of a badly designed protocol.)
ahhhh, is this why you think that there is no need for any
new or
old protocol at all ?
--
" The mind, once expanded to the dimensions of larger ideas, never
returns to its original size."
Les Enfants Terribles
www.let.de
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf