-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
not speaking for anyone but myself.....
one matter of principle:
are you of the opinion that the IESG should try to police which
experiments get run on the Internet by refusing to publish RFCs
documenting possibly-conflicting experments?
Let me phrase it this way: the IESG should not sanction conflicting
experiments by publishing conflicting specifications, especially not if
those specifications were explicitly requested by the IESG as individual
submissions after the demise of a working group that had previously
already shown consensus on not allowing that conflict which has only
_now_ become a reality in one of the individual submissions.
Julian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDDlonwL7PKlBZWjsRAiYZAJ0eTdjybYoeUHDPenw2bAJ0J1+rdQCgglwP
j9QcH7h68l1nDcrGH7MvxIs=
=eEqD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf