In <7E876E12-3D43-4BFB-8F5B-76C3E985A610(_at_)hxr(_dot_)us> Andrew Newton
<andy(_at_)hxr(_dot_)us> writes:
But since you brought this up: if you (the author of the document) do
not consider this to be an experiment, then perhaps the IETF should
not publish SPF as an Experimental RFC.
I asked for the IESG to not consider the SPF I-D to be experiemental.
It was turned down. According to Ted, *none* of the IESG members
expressed interest in changing the status from Experiemental.
So far, no one has appealed that decision, and there are only a few
days left to do so. Like the appeal on the re-use of SPFv1 records, I
don't think it would be a productive use of my time to write an appeal
on the experimental status, and thus I won't do it.
-wayne