There is a new relationship between ISOC and the IETF for administrative
support as defined by BCP 101 (RFC 4071). Given these changes in our
ties to ISOC, the IAB has been discussing (without coming to any
conclusion on the matter) whether it is any longer appropriate for
someone to simultaneously hold both an IAB/IESG position and a seat on
the ISOC BoT. We think the community should discuss this.
I think that there can certainly be times when the role of an I*
member conflicts with the role of an ISOC BoT member. But it depends a
lot on the particular issue at hand, and there are certainly ways of
dealing with them on a case-by-case basis. E.g., recusal, being very
clear about which hat one is speaking from when making comments,
etc. And in the vast majority issues, it's unclear to me that there
are so many inherent conflict of interest situation that one is lead
to the conclusion that dual appointments should never happen.
So, I don't think that the potential for conflicts should be cause for
an absolute prohibition on such dual appointments.
In the case of the IAB making an ISOC BoT selection/recommendation, I
would hope that (should they) seriously consider appointing someone
who is already an I* member, they would take into consideration such
factors as "doing too much already", would they be able to deal with
conflicts in an appropriate fashion, etc. Likewise, I would
hope/expect that the nomcom would do the same when considering a
nomination for an I* position for a sitting ISOC BoT member.
But at the end of the day, if the IAB (nomcom) concludes that the best
person for the job is indeed a current I* (ISOC BoT) member, I think
we'd be better served by allowing them to exercise good judgement
(i.e, do what they are supposed to do).
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf