On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 14:36, john(_dot_)loughney(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com wrote:
If there was a way to lighten-up the IESG review process, then this
would be a good idea. For example, having a single DISCUSS per Area
would be one way to reduce this could be one solution.
Why do you think this would make any difference in practice? chances
are that an AD-pair would agree to hold a DISCUSS if either felt that an
issue should block publication.
From my point of view, a far greater source of delay is the
extraordinarily rapid change in the standards applied to documents by
the IESG; it seems that, if your document editor is very busy, by the
time a document is reworked to address one set of editorial standards, a
new requirement (leading to a new blocking DISCUSS) is likely to appear.
seems like we could avoid this sort of logrolling by judging a document
based on the rules published and in force at the time it was submitted
to the IESG.
- Bill
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf