--On torsdag, september 29, 2005 17:02:48 -0400 Ken Raeburn
<raeburn(_at_)MIT(_dot_)EDU> wrote:
So, to summarize my look at a few of the messages: You both lose points
for some of your statements or how you tried to make your arguments, and
the accuracy of the summary page is questionable. None of it, so far,
really suggests any sort of professional dishonesty on Ted's part to me.
(If this were a research paper instead of an email message, I'd probably
want him to be much more careful and even pedantic in his arguments, but
that would be about the quality of the work, not honesty.)
I think you illustrate quite well why I'm glad I don't have to talk to Dean
Anderson any more.
Any conversation where I can't toss of a casual remark without getting
virtually crucified for it is a conversation not worth having.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf