Cual es? Si el Last Call fue correcto en la primera vez, tiene ningun
discordanica? O aun dice que el Last Call no tiene razon? Presenta dos
declaraciones, pero los dos finjan que el otro no exista. Parece que el
EEUU es mal pase lo que pase. Es posible que eso es su punto?
(Which is it? If the Last Call was correct the first time, would you have
no complaint? Or still would you say the Last Call is wrong? You have
stated two arguments which pretend the other doesn't exist. It seems the
US is evil no matter what. Is it possible that this is really your point?)
-Alexis
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Eduardo Mendez wrote:
::Mr. Noel,
::I am sorry. There is nothing nationalism.
::(Which nationalism?)
::
::The IETF is a subsidiary of ISOC.
::It is incorporated in a country (USA? Swiss?)
::This country seems to authorize what others do not.
::
::IANAL but I advise Governments.
::It is always difficult in cases where laws conflict.
::I am only interested in technical RFC 3683 things.
::If it permits this it is wrong for the IETF. That is all.
::
::Eduardo Mendez.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf