--On onsdag, desember 21, 2005 05:36:08 -0800 "william(at)elan.net"
<william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net> wrote:
I also think that if allowed to be presented alternatives to putting
public keys in DNS, those would technically be found superior and less
damaging to internet. Other aspects of proposal also had alternatives
that are superior, but by bypassing MASS and presenting DKIM in current
form with constraints on discussion, all that "mess" is avoided.
My usual immediate response to anything that contains the phrase "allowed
to be presented" is "where's the draft".
MASS had its BOF and its mailing list, so I'm assuming that whoever
participated in that discussion discovered the fact that they could publish
an internet-draft for ANYTHING without prior approval, as long as it was
done in their own name and not in the IETF's.
So in this case, the drafts might actually be out there.
If so - what's the draft names?
Harald
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org