It's a significant precedent that IETF charters have included language
of this sort when there has been a deployed base at the time the WG is
chartered. But can someone explain what's different in this wording
that warrants departing from the version on which there seems to be
rough consensus?
there isn't a DKIM WG yet, so "rough consensus" of the mailing list is
irrelevant.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf