In message
<A9062431F4994D02CD846987(_at_)sirius(_dot_)fac(_dot_)cs(_dot_)cmu(_dot_)edu>,
Jeffrey Hutzelman
writes:
It seems like the more efficient approach would be to essentially have two
stages, where the authors first sign off on the result of copy-editing, and
then on whatever cosmetic changes are needed after the final conversion.
That assumes that the xml->nroff conversion is always error-free. I
think that that's an overassumption.
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf