In message
<20060219013238(_dot_)779CC22241D(_at_)laser(_dot_)networkresonance(_dot_)com>,
Eric Rescor
la writes:
Since the IETF would not have change control, this is an inappropriate
work item for the TLS WG and therefore the authors appear to have
decided on an Individual Submission. The reason for the intended status
of Proposed Standard
Do we have a process issue here? Can we have a Proposed Standard
without the IETF having change control? (2026 speaks of change control
only in the context of a WG.)
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf