Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard

Can we have a Proposed Standard
without the IETF having change control?


No.  RFC3978 says, in section 5.2 where it describes the derivative
works limitation that's present in draft-santesson-tls-ume, "These
notices may not be used with any standards-track document".

  Bill

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, (continued) Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Keith Moore Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Eric Rescorla Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Dave Cridland Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Tony Finch Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Dave Crocker Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Steven M. Bellovin Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Dave Crocker RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to ProposedStandard, Pasi.Eronen Message not available RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to ProposedStandard, Russ Housley RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to ProposedStandard, Ari Medvinsky Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Bill Fenner <= Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Russ Housley Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Bill Strahm RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Pasi.Eronen RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Gray, Eric Message not available RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Russ Housley Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Bernard Aboba