So you mean you think is reasonable and fair going for the cheapest even if
every time more and more people can't attend because a government decides
not to grant visas ?
I'm feeling very embarrassed and concerned hearing that.
I guess our concept of fairness is quite different.
Precisely following your recommendation we are being politically driven,
instead of openly-in-the-IETF-way driven.
Regards,
Jordi
De: David Kessens <david(_dot_)kessens(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com>
Responder a: <ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Fecha: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:24:34 -0800
Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi(_dot_)palet(_at_)consulintel(_dot_)es>
CC: "ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org" <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Asunto: Re: Making IETF happening in different regions
Jordi,
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 06:11:06PM -0600, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
We need to calculate the average cost of IETF hosted in all the continents,
and that cost is the one that need to be put on the table by any
sponsor/host regardless of where the meeting is actually going to be hosted.
Why would we go for the average instead of the cheapest ?
Overall price of a meeting location is an easier criteria to measure and
more fair than all kind of political considerations.
David Kessens
---
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Slides available at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that
any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, including attached files, is prohibited.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf