Right. I am proposing the addition of "(Informative)" after the
KeyNote section title. Also, I proposed assigning the KeyNote code
point from the "specification required" set of numbers instead of the
set that is associated with standards track documents.
Russ
At 11:07 AM 5/24/2006, Stephen Kent wrote:
Russ,
I concur with Pasi's observations. I don't recall seeing a similar
structure in an RFC, where a part is informative, in what is
otherwise a standards track document.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf