IETF Discussion (date)
May 31, 2006
- EAP Extensions (EAPExt) BoF Proposal Discussion, Narayanan, Vidya, 17:36
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Fred Baker, 13:39
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Bill Fenner, 13:03
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Fred Baker, 10:58
- RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Margaret Wasserman, 09:30
- Out-of-Office AutoReply: draft-ietf-geopriv-location-types-registry-06.txt updated by Amy Vezza, Ted Hardie, 08:08
- Creation of nettest mailing list, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 06:11
May 30, 2006
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, John C Klensin, 16:15
- Re: IETF-SDO liaison, Brian E Carpenter, 14:10
- Re: IETF-SDO liaison (was Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Thomas Narten, 12:44
- RE: IETF-SDO liaison (was Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Avi Lior, 12:28
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Scott Bradner, 12:08
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Geoff Huston, 12:03
- IETF-SDO liaison (was Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Vijay Devarapalli, 11:58
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Scott Bradner, 09:48
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Michael StJohns, 09:45
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Eliot Lear, 09:45
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Brian E Carpenter, 09:03
- RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Gray, Eric, 09:03
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Scott W Brim, 09:03
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Eliot Lear, 08:37
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Brian E Carpenter, 08:30
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Yaakov Stein, 08:17
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Gray, Eric, 08:15
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Gray, Eric, 08:04
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Yoshihiro Ohba, 07:54
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Joel M. Halpern, 07:54
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,, Subir Das, 07:41
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Stewart Bryant, 06:20
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Bernard Aboba, 01:20
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Florian Weimer, 00:20
May 29, 2006
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Yoshihiro Ohba, 21:39
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Brian E Carpenter, 13:27
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Avi Lior, 10:03
- RFC 3066 double Bis?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 09:24
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Harald Alvestrand, 02:29
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin, 01:54
- AW: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actuallyuseful?), Tschofenig, Hannes, 01:11
- AW: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Tschofenig, Hannes, 01:11
May 28, 2006
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Junghoon Jee, 19:33
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 16:14
- received processing power, Ashfaaq H Poonawala, 12:31
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 08:24
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Bill Fenner, 05:55
May 27, 2006
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 18:07
- automatic discovery [Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?], Pekka Savola, 10:46
- Re: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Jari Arkko, 10:11
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Yoshihiro Ohba, 09:09
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Lakshminath Dondeti, 08:17
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Yoshihiro Ohba, 08:07
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 07:07
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin, 00:28
May 26, 2006
- Re: Kerberos, Jari Arkko, 23:16
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Jari Arkko, 23:12
- Re: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Dave Crocker, 21:54
- RE: Kerberos, Narayanan, Vidya, 19:37
- PANA vs. RADIUS/Diameter (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin, 18:41
- Re: Kerberos, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 18:08
- Re: AW: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Mohan Parthasarathy, 16:58
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Lakshminath Dondeti, 16:41
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Narayanan, Vidya, 16:35
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Fleischman, Eric, 16:35
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Lakshminath Dondeti, 16:26
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Vijay Devarapalli, 16:21
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin, 16:05
- Re: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Lakshminath Dondeti, 15:58
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Robert Sayre, 15:58
- EAP/IKEv2 as an alternative to PANA (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin, 15:34
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Geoff Huston, 15:33
- Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin, 15:22
- Framework document scope (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin, 15:15
- NEA scope (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin, 15:12
- RE: Kerberos, Narayanan, Vidya, 15:11
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Jari Arkko, 14:30
- AW: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Tschofenig, Hannes, 14:29
- Kerberos, Sam Hartman, 14:29
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Sam Hartman, 14:29
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Narayanan, Vidya, 12:03
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Narayanan, Vidya, 11:40
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Lakshminath Dondeti, 11:33
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Lucy E. Lynch, 11:32
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Gray, Eric, 11:18
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Narayanan, Vidya, 11:07
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Sam Hartman, 10:13
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Dave Crocker, 10:13
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA partly useful?, Peter Dambier, 09:39
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Pete Resnick, 09:39
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Peter Dambier, 09:28
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Dave Crocker, 09:14
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Sam Hartman, 09:10
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Ralph Droms, 08:59
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Bernard Aboba, 08:59
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, "Antonio F. Gómez Skarmeta", 08:51
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, "Antonio F. Gómez Skarmeta", 08:50
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Joel M. Halpern, 08:46
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Ralph Droms, 08:46
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Paul Hoffman, 08:46
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Dave Crocker, 08:35
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Ralph Droms, 08:35
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Sam Hartman, 08:35
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Sam Hartman, 08:09
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Jari Arkko, 07:29
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Jari Arkko, 06:54
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Joel M. Halpern, 06:48
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Ralph Droms, 06:30
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Jari Arkko, 06:29
- Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Eliot Lear, 06:26
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 05:57
May 25, 2006
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, "Antonio F. Gómez Skarmeta", 23:55
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Avi Lior, 23:17
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Alper Yegin, 23:10
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Yoshihiro Ohba, 22:36
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Bernard Aboba, 21:25
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Bernard Aboba, 21:20
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Yoshihiro Ohba, 21:19
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Alper Yegin, 20:43
- Re: Last Call: 'SMTP Submission Service Extension for Future Message Release' to Proposed Standard (draft-vaudreuil-futuredelivery), Scott Kitterman, 20:43
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ash-alt-formats-02.txt, Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), ALABS, 20:11
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Joel M. Halpern, 20:04
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, John C Klensin, 19:47
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Bernard Aboba, 19:34
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Alper Yegin, 18:37
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS), 18:30
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS), 18:06
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Leslie Daigle, 17:40
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Sam Hartman, 17:32
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Leslie Daigle, 17:18
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Bernard Aboba, 16:50
- Last Call: IETF Calendar 2008 - 2010 Ver 02, Ray Pelletier, 16:50
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Lakshminath Dondeti, 14:28
- Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Sam Hartman, 13:35
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch, 09:23
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, John C Klensin, 08:22
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, John C Klensin, 07:55
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, todd glassey, 07:21
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch, 06:45
- 'help', Sheikh, Usman Fakhar \(UMKC-Student\), 06:43
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS), 05:32
- Re: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Joel M. Halpern, 04:03
- Call for Entries, Deadline 15th June 2006, Raju Sutar, 02:33
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Harald Alvestrand, 01:56
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Harald Alvestrand, 01:47
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Harald Alvestrand, 01:46
- Tracking IPR (Re: RFC Author Count and IPR), Harald Alvestrand, 01:42
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Alper Yegin, 01:15
May 24, 2006
- Re: cApitalization, Ross Finlayson, 23:29
- Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, David Conrad, 21:20
- Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, David Conrad, 20:58
- Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, John C Klensin, 18:23
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Vijay Devarapallli, 17:13
- ARPAnet's Problems Persist Unsolved Today, Fleischman, Eric, 16:12
- Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 16:10
- RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 15:44
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch, 15:00
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden, 14:47
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch, 14:16
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden, 14:00
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch, 13:57
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Josh Howlett, 13:57
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden, 13:37
- Re: Authors and Editors (was Re: RFC Author Count and IPR), Bob Braden, 13:25
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden, 13:25
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch, 13:07
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Lucy E. Lynch, 12:54
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Narayanan, Vidya, 12:48
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Lakshminath Dondeti, 12:48
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, John Loughney, 12:48
- Authors and Editors (was Re: RFC Author Count and IPR), Spencer Dawkins, 12:48
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden, 12:20
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman, 12:19
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Andy Bierman, 12:18
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman, 12:18
- RE: RFC Author Count and IPR, Gray, Eric, 12:04
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Ken Raeburn, 11:59
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden, 11:59
- RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05, Russ Housley, 11:59
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Vijay Devarapallli, 11:51
- RE: RFC Author Count and IPR, Gray, Eric, 11:49
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Henning Schulzrinne, 11:44
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Russ Housley, 11:44
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden, 11:44
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman, 11:36
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Vijay Devarapallli, 11:31
- RE: RFC Author Count and IPR, David Harrington, 11:30
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Russ Housley, 11:30
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Pekka Savola, 11:30
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman, 11:08
- Re: cApitalization, Ned Freed, 10:53
- Re: cApitalization, Ted Faber, 10:40
- RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05, Stephen Kent, 10:33
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Masataka Ohta, 10:26
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 10:22
- RFC Author Count and IPR, Russ Housley, 09:38
- [Sam Hartman] [Ietf-http-auth] BOF Request: WARP - Web Authentication Resistant to Phishing, Sam Hartman, 09:24
- The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Sam Hartman, 08:19
- Re: cApitalization, Dave Aronson, 06:31
- Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Eliot Lear, 06:13
- Re: cApitalization, Noel Chiappa, 05:56
- RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05, Pasi.Eronen, 01:17
May 23, 2006
- Re: cApitalization, Bill Strahm, 21:53
- Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, John C Klensin, 13:52
- Re: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05, Russ Housley, 10:02
- RE: cApitalization, Bob O'Hara \(boohara\), 09:11
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Dave Crocker, 08:04
- cApitalization, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 07:31
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, John C Klensin, 02:42
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Lars Eggert, 02:23
- Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05, Pasi.Eronen, 01:06
May 22, 2006
- FW: Fwd: TLS authorizations draft, Fleischman, Eric, 22:43
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, John C Klensin, 16:12
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Keith Moore, 15:44
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Cullen Jennings, 15:24
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Lars Eggert, 14:17
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, John C Klensin, 14:15
- Re: Fwd: TLS authorizations draft, Eric Rescorla, 13:28
- Re: Fwd: TLS authorizations draft, Stephen Kent, 13:08
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 12:48
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Black_David, 12:02
- negotiation of the parameters of SIP, TANIOS Charbel, 12:02
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Black_David, 12:02
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 11:08
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, John C Klensin, 10:30
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 09:20
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, John C Klensin, 09:10
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 07:57
May 19, 2006
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, John C Klensin, 09:40
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Spencer Dawkins, 09:20
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 08:45
- Re: Last Call: 'IETF Process and Operations Documentss' to Experimental RFC (draft-alvestrand-ipod), John C Klensin, 05:21
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, John C Klensin, 04:54
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier, 03:47
May 18, 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Keith Moore, 19:46
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Cullen Jennings, 19:31
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 19:31
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier, 17:55
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Spencer Dawkins, 09:50
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier, 08:09
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Spencer Dawkins, 08:02
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier, 07:25
- Fwd: TLS authorizations draft, Russ Housley, 07:19
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ólafur Guðmundsson, 06:57
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Harald Alvestrand, 00:06
May 17, 2006
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 23:44
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Allison Mankin, 12:48
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Allison Mankin, 10:07
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Scott W Brim, 10:01
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier, 09:54
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Spencer Dawkins, 09:46
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Dave Crocker, 09:28
- Re: FW: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Brian E Carpenter, 09:19
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, John C Klensin, 08:45
- Fwd: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Marshall Eubanks, 08:32
- appeal against an IESG decision, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 07:13
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, John C Klensin, 06:43
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier, 06:31
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Joe Abley, 06:27
- FW: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 05:07
- Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier, 04:00
May 16, 2006
- RE: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensionsfrom Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC, Margaret Wasserman, 16:30
- Re: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensions from Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC, John Leslie, 15:40
- Re: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensions from Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC, Sam Hartman, 11:22
- RE: policy enforcement points and management [RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:58
- Re: Possible new work items in the General Area, Brian E Carpenter, 04:12
- Announcement! Call for Entries., Raju Sutar, 01:03
- RE: policy enforcement points and management [RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)], Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 00:22
May 15, 2006
- policy enforcement points and management [RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)], Pekka Savola, 22:12
- RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:56
- Off topic: Montreal pipe organ builder tour, Ole Jacobsen, 14:48
- RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 14:14
- RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:14
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Keith Moore, 10:38
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Sam Hartman, 09:30
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Keith Moore, 07:18
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Pekka Savola, 03:50
May 09, 2006
- Announcement of the new work : Link Characteristic Information for Mobility, Soohong Daniel Park, 19:12
- RE: Perils of Last Minute Change (Was: RE: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt), Margaret Wasserman, 08:58
- RE: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt, Margaret Wasserman, 08:34
- Re: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt, Sam Hartman, 07:46
- Re: Perils of Last Minute Change (Was: RE: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt), Harald Alvestrand, 07:10
- Perils of Last Minute Change (Was: RE: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt), Margaret Wasserman, 06:56
- RE: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt, Margaret Wasserman, 06:39