Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar

John,

On May 23, 2006, at 1:09, John C Klensin wrote:
> So, from my perspective, that one-week buffer (or at least a
> four or five day one exclusive of possible travel time) is
> needed if I am to actively participate in two nearly-adjacent
> meetings.
I realize people are different. For me - and I guess for Dan - the  
additional travel time (each intercontinental flight kills a day) and  
jet lag associated with spaced-out meetings are worse.
>   If I were going to one or both meetings just to sit
> there, rather than being actively and intensely involved, it
> would be different and I'd want the meetings as close together
> as possible.
Few of us have the luxury of going to meetings "just to sit there."

Lars
--
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf