ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?

2006-05-26 09:10:56
"Bernard" == Bernard Aboba <aboba(_at_)internaut(_dot_)com> writes:

    >> My question is more why do they need EAP in situations where
    >> they are not running at the link layer than why do they want or
    >> not want PANA.

    Bernard> The simple answer is that there are situations which IEEE
    Bernard> 802.1X cannot handle on wired networks.  As specified,
    Bernard> IEEE 802.1X is "network port control", which means that
    Bernard> authorization is controllable only at the port level.  If
    Bernard> there is more than one host connected to a switch port,
    Bernard> then that model no longer applies.

Yeah.  I guess I wonder whether you are actually getting network
access authenticatino at that point or whether you are getting a
service that allows you to check posture.  It seems that a service
that simply allows you to check posture should be not EAP.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>