Ever since PANA was first proposed, I did not understand why the IETF
accepted it as a work item, because it seemed to me that it was
duplicating existing capabilities (e.g., RADIUS, Diameter, etc.) and
thereby needlessly increasing complexity system-wide.
By this discussion, I surmise that you have greater insights than I.
Hence this question to you:
"What 'bad thing' would happen should PANA not go forward?"
I suspect that this question has been answered many times. But could you
please answer it using simple concepts for the benefit of those of us
who aren't thinking deeply on a sleepy Friday evening? I am particularly
interested in whether you believe end users require PANA and, if so,
why? Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf