John C Klensin wrote:
This is just my personal opinion, but I don't think that is good
enough. If we have "must avoid" entities, then we ought to be
establishing administrative<-> administrative liaisons/ contact
points as well as technical ones, we ought to be proactively
sending out lists and requesting updates before we make
decisions, etc.
Exactly.
This is a community. It extends beyond the boundaries of the IETF and
the IETF is not the "center' of that community.
The model of passively waiting for a random person to notify event
planners of conflicts should be a fallback mechanism, not a primary
means of coordination among principal organizations within the community.
There is plenty of history with IETF-related scheduling conflicts to
make it possible to list the other organizations with which coordination
should be proactive.
d/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf