On Wed Jun 21 00:36:26 2006, Keith Moore wrote:
As someone who has actually tried producing I-Ds in alternate
formats,
I'm not sure that I agree that there's much benefit to having only
I-Ds
use the new format. People who review the document need to be
able to
see something close to the version that will actually be published.
I would find it interesting if the I-Ds were at least available in
their source format as well as their TXT format, though, especially
if that was xml2rfc, and it's certainly a more practical zone for
experiments about formats than the RFC series itself.
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave(_at_)cridland(_dot_)net -
xmpp:dwd(_at_)jabber(_dot_)org
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf