Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request

ietf

Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request

2006-07-22 00:21:22

Henrik Levkowetz wrote:

So how would you specify the requirement to provide rsync
functionality in the SOW?


I would think you would say something like, "The RFC Editor shall make
available an archive of RFCs in ways most convenient to both active
participants and casual observers" and leave it at that. 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Bob Braden Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Henrik Levkowetz No code of conduct. No "hold-harmless" sections of the IETF's participation agreements has an interesting effect..., todd glassey Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Eliot Lear <= Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Eliot Lear Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Doug Barton Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Bill Fenner Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Henrik Levkowetz Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, Bill Fenner

Previous by Date:	Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions), Scott W Brim
Next by Date:	Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
Previous by Thread:	No code of conduct. No "hold-harmless" sections of the IETF's participation agreements has an interesting effect..., todd glassey
Next by Thread:	Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request, todd glassey
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]