Dear Todd,
Your computation was before the "JFC 3683" jurisprudence.
At 21:41 11/08/2006, todd glassey wrote:
By the above rule the posting party is entitled to respond to
those 25 retorts to their post - this by the way is usually referred to as
"vetting" in IETF WG Lingo so... its right on scope.
This is "DoSing" when you disagree with your competition which
created the WG to exclude you :-)
Hell I can easily see 100 posts a day being totally reasonable per person.
Remember this is about participation.
Fortunately Harald documented this. He made the list of all my mails
from Jan 2, 2005 to Sep 15, 2005 to support his PR-action.
They decided that a DoS: is ... 3 (three) mails a day.
Randy registered most of the point I rose. Certainly more than 70.
This paid back: I obtained all the consensus I wanted. So, now they
violates it :-) .
Cheers!
jfc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf