Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed S

Julian Reschke wrote:
> With respect to draft 14, I notice that the reference to RFC2518bis has 
> been downgraded to RFC2518 (which I don't object to), but that 
> references *into* RFC2518 now use broken section numbers (as they 
> haven't been updated accordingly).
Hi Julian,

I'm sorry but all references into RFC2518 have been updated accordingly
as far I can tell. Am I missing something?

Cheers,
Bernard


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf