James Galvin wrote:
First .. the instant there was a problem the IETF community
should have been notified in full on this list.
Perhaps, in this particular case, but in general the NOMCOM operates
under the veil of confidentiality.
Specifically, the process of selecting the nomcom does *not*.
Historically that veil has covered
most everything about the NOMCOM (in spite of the "leakage"), and I
would not expect that to change any time soon.
The process of selecting the nomcom has been fully public for a very
long time.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf