On Wednesday, October 04, 2006 02:31:36 PM -0700 todd glassey
<tglassey(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)net> wrote:
Vidya good commentary, maybe I can add some more. The NEA, per the
charter-need's justification statement says:
Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA) architectures have been implemented
in the industry to assess the "posture" of endpoint devices
Ah two new terms of Art - "Posture" and "Devices".
I only see one. I believe "device" is a fairly well-understood term,
though perhaps "node" would have been more appropriate in this context.
However, I completely agree that this proposed charter uses the term
"posture" far too often not to define it. I fail to see how whether my
computer is sitting upright or lying on its side is relevant to whether it
should be allowed access to the network.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf