At 08:12 PM 11/5/2006, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
> It might be worthwhile for the community to know the feedback
> is known to
> * the voting members of the nomcom
> * nomcom current and past year's chair
> * the 3 liaison members
> * the tools team (some of them are IETF contributors)
> * whoever maintains the nomcom list archives
> * ???
"The tools team" is a bit broad, of course a Web server with a
HTML form sending mail has an admin. Like a Web server with a
mail archive.
> Frankly the feedback does not need to seen by anyone other
> than the voting members IMO. What do others think?
In theory. In practice I don't see how you can get rid of the
admins.
The nomcom chair could maintain the email server and the nomcom chair
can also continue to serve as the anonymizer. This will include the
nomcom chair in the list of people who one might be comfortable to
share that information with.
If voting members are the only ones who should be allowed to see the
feedback and the nomination information, then we may have to change
how we select the nomcom chair.
The other option is to use admins who don't care about the
IETF. They are not interested in the information and it is not
really worth a whole lot on the open market so to speak.
regards,
Lakshminath
For any nominations I hope that you ask ??? if they
consider to volunteer, if the nomination passed a giggle test.
It's probably not necessary that they know who nominated them,
or is it ? Ditto the liaisons.
Frank
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf