On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
2. There's clearly a need, if the work is to be expanded into new
applications areas, for the experts in those applications to be
deeply involved. That is in fact the main argument why the work
should be done in the IETF if it's done at all. I understand that
this would need a major injection of new blood into the WG. That
won't happen by means of a simple re-charter. It needs an impetus
that would be noticed throughout the IETF.
An alternative to trying to get all the application specialists in a
RAI WG would be to try to get folks from RAI to other areas. That
would be similar to what v6ops WG did 3-4 years ago.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf